August 25, 2005

Code Pink At It Again

Sometimes you wonder which kids grew up under power lines.

We are constantly bombarded by the left with their anti-Bush but support the troops mentality. How many times have you heard an entertainer, a liberal politician or (fill in the blank) personality say that they are in full support of our military?

Lessons learned from the Vietnam era with regards to repecting our military, were indoctrinated upon my generation. We were told horror stories of the maltreatment of our veterans upon their return from Vietnam. They were spat upon, they were harassed, they were unemployable and it was a period of time that was later regretted by much of the populace.

Here in 2005, when we all are suppose to know that our military simply does as the Commander in Chief (whoever that may be) instructs them to; that we appreciate them no matter our own political ideology, that their own personal sacrifices out weigh all policy issues; these soldiers are once again being harassed. Harassed by none other than Code Pink.

Since March of this year Code Pink has been protesting VETERANS from the Iraq/Afghanistan war being treated at The Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C. They protest outside the facility holding signs such as "Maimed For Lies" and they harass the patients and their families entering and exiting the hospital. At one point they placed flag draped coffins on the sidewalk claiming that it respresented the loss of lives in Iraq.

I have touched on Code Pink before and here's my same question once again; why do these 'waste of oxygen' women have an issue with the military? Yes, once again I would like to remind these women that it's the military that keeps their sorry, worthless asses safe and free. Talk about biting the hand that feeds you.

This is part of the reason I blog. I have sat and watched my gender bring about an era in which men are being discriminated against. I cannot, I will not, sit idly by and allow only the squeaky wheel to receive all the attention. I have sons, sons that are interested in joining the military. I would be proud to have my sons serve their nation with honor. Let's not forget that our voice is larger than these few.

If you would like to read the piece from CNS News about this story, you can click over or go to the extended entry for their full story.

Anti-War Protests Target Wounded at Army Hospital
By Marc Morano
CNSNews.com Senior Staff Writer
August 25, 2005

Washington (CNSNews.com) - The Walter Reed Army Medical Center in Washington, D.C., the current home of hundreds of wounded veterans from the war in Iraq, has been the target of weekly anti-war demonstrations since March. The protesters hold signs that read "Maimed for Lies" and "Enlist here and die for Halliburton."

The anti-war demonstrators, who obtain their protest permits from the Washington, D.C., police department, position themselves directly in front of the main entrance to the Army Medical Center, which is located in northwest D.C., about five miles from the White House.

Among the props used by the protesters are mock caskets, lined up on the sidewalk to represent the death toll in Iraq.

Code Pink Women for Peace, one of the groups backing anti-war activist Cindy Sheehan's vigil outside President Bush's ranch in Crawford Texas, organizes the protests at Walter Reed as well.

Some conservative supporters of the war call the protests, which have been ignored by the establishment media, "shameless" and have taken to conducting counter-demonstrations at Walter Reed. "[The anti-war protesters] should not be demonstrating at a hospital. A hospital is not a suitable location for an anti-war demonstration," said Bill Floyd of the D.C. chapter of FreeRepublic.com, who stood across the street from the anti-war demonstrators on Aug. 19.

"I believe they are tormenting our wounded soldiers and they should just leave them alone," Floyd added.

According to the Walter Reed Army Medical Center, nearly 4,000 individuals involved in the Iraq war were treated at the facility as of March of this year, 1,050 of whom were wounded in battle.

One anti-war protester, who would only identify himself as "Luke," told Cybercast News Service that "the price of George Bush's foreign policy can be seen right here at Walter Reed -- young men who returned from Iraq with their bodies shattered after George Bush sent them to war for a lie."

Luke accused President Bush of "exploiting American soldiers" while "oppressing the other nations of earth." The president "has killed far too many people," he added.

On Aug. 19, as the anti-war protesters chanted slogans such as "George Bush kills American soldiers," Cybercast News Service observed several wounded war veterans entering and departing the gates of Walter Reed, some with prosthetic limbs. Most of the demonstrations have been held on Friday evenings, a popular time for the family members of wounded soldiers to visit the hospital.

But the anti-war activists were unapologetic when asked whether they considered such signs as "Maimed for Lies" offensive to wounded war veterans and their families.

"I am more offended by the fact that many were maimed for life. I am more offended by the fact that they (wounded veterans) have been kept out of the news," said Kevin McCarron, a member of the anti-war group Veterans for Peace.

Kevin Pannell, who was recently treated at Walter Reed and had both legs amputated after an ambush grenade attack near Baghdad in 2004, considers the presence of the anti-war protesters in front of the hospital "distasteful."

When he was a patient at the hospital, Pannell said he initially tried to ignore the anti-war activists camped out in front of Walter Reed, until witnessing something that enraged him.

"We went by there one day and I drove by and [the anti-war protesters] had a bunch of flag-draped coffins laid out on the sidewalk. That, I thought, was probably the most distasteful thing I had ever seen. Ever," Pannell, a member of the Army's First Cavalry Division, told Cybercast News Service.

"You know that 95 percent of the guys in the hospital bed lost guys whenever they got hurt and survivors' guilt is the worst thing you can deal with," Pannell said, adding that other veterans recovering from wounds at Walter Reed share his resentment for the anti-war protesters.

"We don't like them and we don't like the fact that they can hang their signs and stuff on the fence at Walter Reed," he said. "[The wounded veterans] are there to recuperate. Once they get out in the real world, then they can start seeing that stuff (anti-war protests). I mean Walter Reed is a sheltered environment and it needs to stay that way."

McCarron said he dislikes having to resort to such controversial tactics, "but this stuff can't be hidden," he insisted. "The real cost of this war cannot be kept from the American public."

The anti-war protesters claim their presence at the hospital is necessary to publicize the arrivals of newly wounded soldiers from Iraq, who the protesters allege are being smuggled in at night by the Pentagon to avoid media scrutiny. The protesters also argue that the military hospital is the most appropriate place for the demonstrations and that the vigils are designed to ultimately help the wounded veterans.

"If I went to war and lost a leg and then found out from my hospital bed that I had been lied to, that the weapons I was sent to search for never existed, that the person who sent me to war had no plan but to exploit me, exploit the country I was sent to, I would be pretty angry," Luke told Cybercast News Service.

"I would want people to do something about it and if I couldn't get out of my bed and protest myself, I would want someone else to do it in my name," he added.

The conservative counter-demonstrators carry signs reading "Troops out when the job's done," "Thank you U.S. Armed Forces" and "Shameless Pinkos go home." Many wear the orange T-shirts reading "Club G'itmo" that are marketed by conservative talk show host Rush Limbaugh.

"[The anti-war protesters] have no business here. If they want to protest policy, they should be at the Capitol, they should be at the White House," said Nina Burke. "The only reason for being here is to talk to [the] wounded and [anti-war protests are] just completely inappropriate."

Albion Wilde concurred, arguing that "it's very easy to pick on the families of the wounded. They are very vulnerable ... I feel disgusted.

"[The anti-war protesters] are really showing an enormous lack of respect for just everything that America has always stood for. They lost the election and now they are really, really angry and so they are picking on the wrong people," Wilde added.

At least one anti-war demonstrator conceded that standing out in front of a military hospital where wounded soldiers and their families are entering and exiting, might not be appropriate.

"Maybe there is a better place to have a protest. I am not sure," said a man holding a sign reading "Stop the War," who declined to be identified.

But Luke and the other anti-war protesters dismissed the message of the counter demonstrators. "We know most of the George Bush supporters have never spent a day in uniform, have never been closer to a battlefield than seeing it through the television screen," Luke said.

Code Pink, the group organizing the anti-war demonstrations in front of the Walter Reed hospital, has a controversial leader and affiliations. As Cybercast News Service previously reported, Code Pink co-founder Medea Benjamin has expressed support for the Communist Viet Cong in Vietnam and the Nicaraguan Sandinistas.

In 2001, Benjamin was asked about anti-war protesters sympathizing with nations considered to be enemies of U.S. foreign policy, including the Viet Cong and the Sandinistas. "There's no one who will talk about how the other side is good," she reportedly told the San Francisco Chronicle.

Benjamin has also reportedly praised the Cuban regime of Fidel Castro. Benjamin told the San Francisco Chronicle that her visit to Cuba in the 1980s revealed to her a great country. "It seem[ed] like I died and went to heaven," she reportedly said.

Posted by Stacy at August 25, 2005 12:45 PM | TrackBack
Comments

You go, girl! Hit 'em again.

Posted by: Muley at August 25, 2005 05:39 PM

Hey do me a favor and send a prayer over to Rebekahs Site.
www.rebekahspage.blogspot.com

They are facing some tough decisions on radiation and could use some support. Tell 5 new people about her! Thats my challenge today!Thank you and God Bless! (sorry bout the copy and paste comment. Its the quickest way I can get prayer out! hope you see I just am trying to get a little girl some much needed prayer!)

Posted by: steve at August 25, 2005 06:49 PM

One of these women is on Hannity & Colmes right now spewing her bullsh*t and extolling her "support for our soldiers" as they show clips of protestors with "Don't die for Halliburton" and other such nonsense ...

It's disgusting.

Posted by: at August 25, 2005 09:08 PM

I read the CNS piece this morning and I almost posted about it. However, it was so disturbing to me that I felt like all I wanted to do was scrape the dog crap off my shoe and move on. still, it needs airing, Stacy, and thanks for hittting it with a breath of air freshner. Nice post!

Posted by: BobG at August 25, 2005 09:45 PM

I have seen reps for this vile organization on tv and they make me want to puke. Good article.

Posted by: Karen at August 26, 2005 05:25 PM

I agree that the women of Code Pink are over the top on this one. The recuperating members of our armed forces do not need protesters outside the hospital. On the other hand, most of the people reading this weblog have not dealt with the Department of Veterans Affairs. I have extended family and old acquaintances who work there. Let's just say that the soldiers, sailors, airmen, and marines who are recuperating at Walter Reed are, um, f**ked once they're on their own. That is the sad reality.

Posted by: Wayward Christian at August 26, 2005 10:10 PM

My friend, Cpl. Ryan D. Groves, has spent nearly a year at Walter Reed recovering from wounds suffered just outside Fallujah last October.

I hope he never saw these protesting jerks. If they're so concerned about Veterans' benefits as they claimed on the Hannity and Colmes Show the other night, then they should take their protests over to the Congress, not Walter Reed.

About Groves:

http://www.michaelcalderonscall.com/HelpaWoundedMarine.html

Posted by: Michael Lopez-Calderon at August 27, 2005 05:45 PM

Before anybody else flies off the handle, I'd recommend that you visit

http://www.codepink4peace.org/

and find out for yourself who these people are, what they are doing, and why.

One of the best things about the Internet is that you don't have to take one person's version: you can go straight to the source.

Posted by: Mister Nice Guy at August 29, 2005 02:55 PM

Guess what NG? I've spent a lot of time at that site. I've been keeping tabs on these broads for quite a while. Protesting is an American right, but outside a hospital treating injured service men? And saying the garbage they're saying? They come off as heartless and shallow.

Posted by: at August 29, 2005 03:32 PM

I am also a friend of Ryan D Groves who was severely injured during the Iraq Campaign. However, as I dont live in America and I am not constantly brainwashed by the unilateral view of Ted Turner's media, I can do some thinking of my own and go deeper to the root of the problem. Consequently, I cant stop asking myself what was Ryan doing in Iraq? Who sent him here? Who started this immoral war that led to an amazing amount of killing on both sides while a peaceful prospect does not appear in anyn way near? Who benefited from the war if not Mr beloved Bush's active elevtoral supporrters, the oil, guns and other American companies.. Is itr worth it to create so much grief in the lives of the soldiers both injured and on a mission in Iraq while also propagating an undesired occupation by the population ove there? Who do you think you are, US current administration to decide that you can invade a land and impose your rule against the entire will and culture of a country? These are some questions that people should think about. These questions lead to the actual people that have created the grief in Ryan's life? These are the people that took away his leg! In hope for a more just and fair world, yours sincerely, Teddy Florea

Posted by: Teddy Florea at October 21, 2005 07:28 AM