December 05, 2005

Portrait Of A Traitor

Can you believe this guy? A former US Attorney General defending 'So-Damn-Insane'? I think I'm going to be sick.

RamseyClark.jpg

Posted by Stacy at December 5, 2005 06:03 PM | TrackBack
Comments

Wouldn't you know this pathetic former Attny Gen was appointed by the most pathetic former President...Carter.

IMHO they both have huge ANTI-AMERICAN STREAKS running down their backs.

Posted by: Maggie at December 5, 2005 07:56 PM

I think the US should revoke his passport, so he can't get back into the country. Let him live over there with Sodom Boy.

Posted by: Jeff H at December 5, 2005 11:49 PM

This guy could be the "Liberalism is a Mental Illness" poster boy.

Posted by: BobG at December 6, 2005 07:44 AM

What I'm going to say really isn't going to be popular, but if we believe in our form of justice here in the US, Saddam really deserves the best defense he can afford.

If we do it like Saddam would, we just take him out back and put him in a wood chipper and turn him into fertilizer.

Posted by: Tony at December 6, 2005 08:36 AM

If you check out this fella's dossier, you will get even more sick.

Posted by: bigwhitehat at December 6, 2005 09:53 AM

Tony, you're right. If the trial of Saddam is to be anything other than a lynching, he needs a competent defense. When the verdict then comes down, and despite a well presented defense by competent counsel, he is then found guilty, the verdict has real meaning.

But that's far different from the argument made in favor of trying terrorists from Gitmo in U.S. courts, with all the rights accorded to citizens. I know that's not an issue you raised, but I think the point needs to be made at every opportunity, as the libs continue to deflate the value of citizenship, as though it were an entitlement.

Posted by: Bill at December 6, 2005 12:46 PM

Tony: "[I]f we believe in our form of justice here in the US, Saddam really deserves the best defense he can afford."

Agreed. But Traitor Clark doesn't take cases for the benefit of his clients--he takes them for the chance to get air time to spread his pernicious anti-American, anti-freedom message. He's a disgrace to his profession, his country, and the entire human race. The woodchipper is too good a fate for him, much less Sodom Boy.

Posted by: Jeff H at December 6, 2005 02:59 PM

I didn't know Clark had a license to practice law in Iraq. As far as I know it is an Iraqi court of law.

The other defendents have or had local attorneys (I think.)

Posted by: sandy at December 6, 2005 07:25 PM

The man is a lunatic. The apple doesn't fall far from the tree, his father was corrupt and incompetent as AG and Supreme Court Justice. This man is old and tired and in search for a legacy....this just isn't the way to do it. :(

Posted by: Jessica at December 8, 2005 07:34 AM

Maggie is right. Those anti-American streaks are a mile wide, and I'm pretty sure the retina-scorching shade of yellow isn't a coincidence.
--ER--

Posted by: Enlightenment Reactionary at December 8, 2005 12:52 PM




content="text/html; charset=ISO-8859-1">


Here's the scoop on what you call or who your calling a traitor.

Saddam should have an attorney. If we want democracy in Iraq

we must lead by example.

Mr Clark has a beef with the way our government handles it's military.

It's not so simple as to think of things as bad guy's and good guys. We put
Saddam into power in the first place.

He's done some very horrible things. Let's see him get the justice he deserves.
Face it even Johnny Cochran could not get saddam acquitted.

Mr Clark is doing something that takes allot of courage.

Most attorneys, lawyers would easily weasel out of a situation like this.
He's doing it at seventy seven years of age.

A younger attorney could be instantly famous by representing Saddam Insane
and rake in huge future fees.
OK ?


Posted by: Joemode at December 8, 2005 04:43 PM